18.05.2026

Wij.Leveren

A local sustainable delivery platform that mutualised parcels from Leuven shops, before being politically discontinued despite growing volumes and a digital takeover by Eacend.

Wijleveren 1600x900

Practical information
Description
Timeline
Stakeholders
Strengths and offer
Urban logistics
Positive impacts
Needs
Logistical challenges

Practical information

What?
Wij.Leveren was a digital platform and local parcel consolidation service for local shops and webshops. The service made it possible to group local deliveries and entrust them to sustainable logistics operators.

Who?
The City of Leuven and partner municipalities, local shopkeepers, selected logistics operators, notably bpost and Cargo Velo, as well as European, Flemish and local public support. The digital platform was later taken over by Eacend.

Where?
Leuven and the initial partner municipalities: Haacht, Rotselaar, Holsbeek, Lubbeek, Bierbeek and Oud-Heverlee. The January 2025 press release also mentions the recent arrival of Diest and a planned extension towards Mechelen.

When?
The service was launched at the end of 2022. Volumes grew strongly in 2023–2024, with the 10,000th parcel reached in December 2024. The public service was then stopped following a decision by the new municipal council.

Contact
For history and governance: City of Leuven / former project leads.
For the possible continuation of the platform: Eacend — contact@eacend.com

Resources
City of Leuven press release, 28 January 2025; feedback from Tim Asperges; Eacend website; EFRO Vlaanderen; previous Leuven communications on Wij.Leveren, bpost, Cargo Velo and webshop integration.

Description

Wij.Leveren was a local sustainable distribution service for parcels from local commerce. The central idea was simple: when a customer buys a product from a shop in the region, the parcel does not necessarily need to enter a conventional national circuit before returning to a nearby customer.

The project therefore aimed to mutualise flows, limit unnecessary kilometres and make local e-commerce more competitive with large platforms. Shopkeepers could use the platform to organise parcel pick-up and delivery, after which parcels were grouped and distributed through more sustainable operators.

The important nuance is that Wij.Leveren should now be presented as a successful but interrupted case. Volumes increased, the 10,000th parcel was reached, and the model demonstrated its relevance. But the new municipal council decided to stop the public sustainable urban logistics service. The digital platform was nevertheless taken over by Eacend, opening up a possible path for continuation, partial privatisation or scaling.

Timeline

2021–2022
Development of the concept and first demonstrations of the platform to local shopkeepers.

End of 2022
Operational launch of Wij.Leveren in the Leuven region.

July 2023
A dedicated bpost unit on the Philipssite is highlighted, allowing parcels to be processed locally instead of transiting through more distant centres.

November–December 2023
Promotion of bicycle deliveries through Cargo Velo and improvement of connections with existing webshops.

December 2024
The 10,000th parcel leaves the Vaude shop in Diestsestraat.

28 January 2025
Leuven press release announcing the 10,000-parcel milestone, the doubling of volumes in 2024 compared with 2023, and ambitions for extension or new services.

After this growth phase
Decision by the new municipal council to stop the public sustainable urban logistics service. The digital platform is taken over by Eacend.

Stakeholders

The City of Leuven, as public project lead and local governance actor.

The initial partner municipalities: Haacht, Rotselaar, Holsbeek, Lubbeek, Bierbeek and Oud-Heverlee, with Diest mentioned later and an extension towards Mechelen planned.

Local shops and neighbourhood webshops, which used the platform to organise more sustainable local deliveries.

Logistics operators, notably bpost and Cargo Velo, responsible for processing, grouping or delivering parcels.

Customers of local commerce, who could receive their purchases through a more direct local circuit.

Eacend, which took over the digital platform and could support a continuation, scaling or another form of operation.

European, Flemish and local funders and supporters, notably in the framework of Wij.Leveren 2.0.

Strengths and offer

Shared platform for parcels from local commerce.

Sustainable and grouped local delivery.

Mutualisation of flows between shopkeepers, avoiding redundant trips or detours through distant centres.

Progressive integration of existing webshops to reduce double data entry.

Use of sustainable logistics operators, including bpost and Cargo Velo.

Use of cargo bikes, electric vehicles and local distribution points.

Support for small shopkeepers wishing to offer sustainable e-logistics without building a full service alone.

Real growth of the service: twice as many parcels sent in 2024 as in 2023, with the 10,000-parcel milestone reached at the end of 2024.

A very useful case for Palette: it shows both the technical and commercial feasibility of a local service, and its institutional fragility.

Urban logistics

How does it work?
Local shopkeepers registered on the platform and could offer sustainable local delivery to their customers. When a customer bought a product in a shop or through a webshop, the shopkeeper used Wij.Leveren to organise pick-up and delivery. Parcels were grouped to avoid detours through distant sorting centres and to allow more efficient local delivery rounds. The City of Leuven had selected sustainable logistics operators to handle these grouped deliveries in Leuven and the neighbouring municipalities.

Why is it interesting?
Because Wij.Leveren shows that a local parcel does not necessarily need to be absorbed into a large national network before returning to a nearby customer. The project makes visible a common absurdity of e-commerce: local goods can generate unnecessary kilometres when there is no suitable local infrastructure. By grouping parcels and organising regional distribution, the platform proposed a more direct, more legible alternative compatible with sustainable urban logistics.

Which obstacles does it respond to?
Congestion and multiplication of deliveries in the city; high delivery costs for small shopkeepers; difficulty for local commerce to adapt to e-commerce; lack of simple integration between local webshops and sustainable logistics tools; dependence on conventional parcel circuits; difficulty turning a publicly supported experiment into a structural and politically stable service.

Identified nodes / obstacles
Transport; value for money; service time; small structures; digital integration; webshop interoperability; public governance; political continuity; critical mass of parcels; articulation between public interest, real cost and business model.

Positive impacts

Environment — potential reduction of unnecessary kilometres and use of cleaner delivery modes, notably cargo bikes and electric vehicles.

Space — less congestion and less pressure on public space if local rounds are grouped rather than dispersed.

Neighbourhood — less noise, fewer nuisances and a more local organisation of parcel traffic.

Social relations — strengthening of local commerce, trust in proximity circuits and the capacity of shopkeepers to offer an alternative to large platforms.

Needs

Stable funding or a viable economic model able to move beyond the project or subsidy phase.

A sufficient critical mass of shopkeepers, webshops and parcels to make mutualised rounds efficient.

Technical interoperability with very different webshops, in order to avoid double data entry and friction for shopkeepers.

Reliable logistics partners able to ensure pick-ups, consolidation and deliveries under regular conditions.

Solid governance: either political continuity or an independent structure able to protect the service from changes in majority.

Clarification of Eacend’s role in the continuation: software, brand, data, shopkeepers, operational model or simple technical takeover.

Logistical challenges

The heterogeneity of webshops makes technical integration complex: each shopkeeper may work with their own tools, habits and constraints.

Viability after the subsidised phase remains a central question: who pays the real cost of mutualisation?

The model depended strongly on a local political decision, which made it fragile despite growing volumes.

The transition from a local public service to a platform taken over by a private actor raises a governance question: continuation, privatisation, replication or transformation of the model?

Reaching critical mass requires enough shopkeepers, parcels and regularity for delivery rounds to be efficient.

Public interest — fewer kilometres, support for local commerce, air quality — must be articulated with an economic model capable of lasting over time.

The case shows that operational success does not guarantee institutional continuity: a service can work and still be stopped.